Posts Tagged eighteenth century

Faces of Schenectady: The Mabee Connection

By Ona Curran

 Curator Kathryn Weller and Guest Curator Ona Curran are planning an exhibit on early 18th century portraiture from Schenectady County.  Scheduled to open  May 10, 2010 the exhibit will showcase portraits of the Veeders, Glens, Sanders, Becks, Truax, Swarths, Van Slyck, Ten Eyck and the Society’s portraits of  Helena Van Eps and the Van der Volgens. Illustrated is the portrait of Anna Mol Fairly Beck a niece of Jan Pieterse Mabee the progenitor of the Mabee name in Schenectady and the first Mabee to own the historic Mabee house given to the Society by the late George Franchere, a descendant. Groundbreaking ceremonies were recently held for an Education Center on the site. The portrait of Anna Mol beck is the only known Mabee portrait from this early period of Schenectady history.

Van Cortlandt Manor with Anna Beck portrait

Owned and operated by Historic Hudson Valley, Van Cortlandt Manor presents the life of a Post-American Revolutionary War family. Visitors can see how the house may have been furnished during the early Federal period and learn about the excitment and difficulties of living in a new nation. View of the parlor. The two portraits (1724-1725) are of Caleb and Anna Beck, relatives of the Van Cortlandt family, attributed to artist Nehemiah Partridge. This view also provides a glimpse of the outstanding collection of Chinese export porcelain in the house.

 came to Schenectady in 1703 following her marriage to Caleb Beck. She was the daughter of Engeltie Mabee and Jan Jansen Mol and granddaughter of Pieter Casparzen Mabee and Aechtje Jans.

The exhibit will celebrate the Society’s recent acquisition of the Van der Volgen collection which includes an important portrait of Laurens Claus Van der Volgen  who was taken prisoner by the Indians during the 1690 massacre, returned to Schenectady ten years later and became interpreter for the New York Province. The portrait is attributed to Nehemiah Partridge and was painted about 1720. It is a major addition to the society’s collection.

Portraits of early 18th century residents are in major museum collections throughout the East. The various museums have been invited to participate. The Society is anxious to learn of other portraits of this period which may be in family collections and is interested in hearing from you. Contact Kate Weller Curator or Ona Curran guest curator of the exhibit.

Comments (2)

All Must Die: 18th Century

Image from our past exhibit "Facing the King of Terrors" with reproduction 18th century mourning gown and coffin

Image from our past exhibit "Facing the King of Terrors" with reproduction 18th century mourning gown and coffin

“the one shall be taken and the other left & that this may not be for the worst but for the better.”

 

The death of a loved one was a reminder to the living that death could come at anytime and preparing ones self in the face of God was of utmost importance. If the deceased had died a good death by being properly at peace with the lord, then their death should be viewed as releasing them to a better place. If they had died a bad death, such as suicide, or had lived an unrepentant life, then their passing was a reminder of the need to prepare.

 

“It was the fashion then to have cake at funerals, & spiced wine, and cold wine, and pipes and tabacco … That custom after a while went out of fashion.”

                                                                                                Harriet Mumford Paige

 

Dutch funerals were known in the 18th century for their extravagance. For Deborah Sanders’ funeral in 1786, 600 cakes were baked and thirty-one gallons of rum were purchased to be spiced with cloves and cinnamon. Gifts were given to pallbearers and sometimes to guests. These mementos could include gloves, gold rings, and silver cups and spoons.

 

The Dutch were not alone in their funeral excesses. Viewing luxury as a source of corruption, in 1774 the First Continental Congress discouraged the giving of gloves and scarves at funerals and recommended the wearing of ribbons and armbands instead of mourning dress.

 

George Washington’s death in 1799 was a devastating blow to the new republic. They had lost not only their first president but also the very symbol of the revolution. For the first time, Americans mourned as a nation for their loss. Washington’s death came at the beginning of a change in mourning practices and attitudes, and to an extent helped speed it up. Though it would not be until the mid-19th century that deep mourning would be accepted and even expected, more explicit mourning was coming into practice. Even views toward death were beginning to change. William Pitt Beers gave a local eulogy for Washington in which he reminded everyone that, like Washington, we must all eventually pay our debts in the tomb. Yet Beers was not a minister reminding the living to prepare for God’s judgment, he was a local lawyer who focused on how Washington had live instead of how he had died.

Leave a Comment

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.